Page renewal summary

This archived article has been updated into a practical, plain-English guide. Legacy identity, personal contact details, external promotions and location-specific material have been removed.

Independent guidance for better public participation in health and care research
Children and young people

Young people’s advisory groups in research

What a young people’s advisory group can bring to health research, and practical lessons for planning sessions that are clear, inclusive and worthwhile.

Young people working together around a table
Practice note

Young people’s advisory groups create a route for children and young people to influence research that affects them. Their contributions can help teams make studies, information and activities more understandable and acceptable.

Archived learning updated by Involvestory · 16 September 2025 · 8 minute read

A young people’s advisory group brings together children and young people who want to discuss and improve health research. Groups may be asked to comment at different stages of a project, from early ideas through to the way findings are shared.

A common task is reviewing participant information. Young advisers can identify language that is difficult to follow, questions that remain unanswered and formats that do not feel appropriate for the intended age group. Their perspective can also help research teams consider what participation may feel like in practice.

The central principle

Involvement should have a clear purpose. Be honest about what the group can influence, give enough information to support a meaningful discussion and report back on the decisions that follow.

What young advisers value

Experience from established groups points to several features that help sessions feel useful and respectful:

  • Opportunities to learn about a range of health topics and research questions.
  • A clear explanation of why the group’s views are being sought and how they may be used.
  • Recognition for time, preparation and contribution, planned in line with relevant involvement guidance.
  • Meeting times and arrangements developed with young people and their families, including consideration of travel and competing commitments.
  • Appropriate acknowledgement of contributions and a record of the learning gained.

Planning for participation

Attendance and preferred ways of communicating will differ between members. Make room for this variation rather than expecting a single route to work for everyone. Ask young people how they want to receive information, use accessible formats and give enough notice for them to prepare.

Where younger children are involved, communication with parents or carers can support practical arrangements. This should sit alongside direct, age-appropriate communication with the young people themselves.

Design sessions around the group

  • Invite young people to influence dates, timings and the structure of meetings.
  • Match materials to the ages and experiences of the people reviewing them.
  • Allow time for discussion, questions and activities rather than attempting to cover too much.
  • Use a mix of methods, including visual material and small-group tasks, instead of relying solely on presentations.
  • Build in breaks and social activities where appropriate.
  • Use language that is straightforward, respectful and never patronising.
  • Gather feedback at the end of sessions and show how it has shaped the next one.

What this can improve

When researchers work with a young people’s advisory group, they can gain practical insight into the clarity of study information, the acceptability of planned activities and aspects of study design that adults may overlook. The group can also help teams test whether research communications are understandable before they are widely used.

For young people, involvement can offer a structured opportunity to learn about research, exchange views with peers and develop communication or collaborative working skills. The value of that experience depends on careful support, realistic expectations and visible feedback about the group’s influence.

Including children and young people early is particularly important when research concerns their health and lives. Their insight is not an add-on: it can help make research questions, processes and outputs more relevant to the people affected.

What good support includes

Build the conditions for meaningful input

Clear preparation and visible follow-through matter as much as the meeting itself.

Accessible materials

Provide plain-language information in advance and explain any research terms that cannot be avoided.

Flexible participation

Consider timing, format, support needs and how young people prefer to communicate.

Feedback on influence

Record recommendations, explain decisions and tell the group what changed as a result.

How to use a group well

From first contact to shared learning

A simple process helps researchers make the most of young people’s time and expertise.

Set the purpose

Identify the decision or material the group can genuinely influence.

Prepare clearly

Share accessible context, focused questions and practical details in good time.

Facilitate fairly

Create varied ways to contribute and give discussion time to everyone.

Report back

Explain what happened next and capture learning for future sessions.

Common questions

Young people’s advisory group FAQ

Is a young people’s advisory group the same as recruiting study participants?

No. Participants provide data for a study. Advisory group members help shape decisions about research, such as the question, materials, methods or communication.

When should a group be involved?

Involve young people as early as possible, while the research question and approach can still be influenced. Continue the conversation at key stages rather than treating it as a one-off review.

What should researchers bring to a session?

Bring a concise explanation of the topic, clear questions, accessible materials and an honest account of the decisions the group can affect.

How can materials be made easier to review?

Use clear language, short sections, helpful headings and visual support where suitable. Ask the group which parts are unclear and what would improve them.

How do we avoid overloading a meeting?

Limit the agenda, set realistic goals and allow time for breaks, activities and discussion. It is better to explore one topic properly than to rush through several.

How should a team follow up?

Send a plain-language summary of the discussion and explain how recommendations were considered. Where an idea cannot be used, give a clear reason.

Find the right guidance

Looking for practical involvement resources?

Share a short description of your research stage and the involvement question you need to address.

Email Involvestory